Social Media for Radiology Education in Gross Anatomy

Two Years of Experience

Liwei Jiang, B.A.
Christopher R. Bailey, M.D.
Krishna Juluru, M.D.
Donna Magid, M.D., M.Ed.

The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

March 11, 2016

No relevant disclosures

Objectives

After attending this presentation, the participant will

  • Appreciate the potential of social media tools in delivering content to learners
  • Recognize the capabilities and limitations of social media metrics in data analysis

Facebook logo

Representative News Feed screenshot

Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook Profile

Taylor Swift’s Facebook Page

Facebook Page: reach millions at once

Anatomy + Radiology

Thieme Anatomy figure CT angiogram

Radiology: the way most physicians see anatomy

Johns Hopkins anatomy lab

TeamRads home page

Anatomy Tutor on TeamRads.com

Pull Learning:
Significant Effort Required

TeamRads: separate, non-integrated site

  • “Yet another system”
  • “Go to Section X, click on Case Y…”
  • Challenge to patience and willpower

Need to invert the flow of educational resources

Push Learning

Goals

Push daily imaging cases in step with anatomy curriculum, directly into the hands of students

  • Drive learning on all devices
    • Computer
    • Phone
    • Tablet
  • Reinforce both anatomy and radiology
  • Foster and measure student engagement
  • Set up once, run automatically

Target Demographic

Students in JHUSOM Human Anatomy course:

  • Medical
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical & Biological Illustration

N ≈ 140 each year, voluntary participation

Project done twice, 2014 and 2015

JH Team Rads Facebook Page

Facebook Like" symbol

Notification with new content

Buffer logo

Buffer integrations

Buffer post scheduling screenshot

Case workflow through Buffer

All cases are carefully de-identified

Structural Limitations

  • Not everyone uses Facebook
  • Previous year’s participants not excluded
  • Facebook Page is public; anyone could participate
  • Extra participants counted in Facebook’s metrics

Facebook Fan demographics screenshot

Limitations

  • Not everyone uses Facebook
  • Previous year’s participants not excluded
  • Facebook Page is public; anyone could participate
  • Extra participants counted in Facebook’s metrics
  • Facebook’s algorithm may broaden content’s visibility
    • Possibly undesirable in controlled environment
  • Participants free to ignore content pushed
  • Currently unable to directly assess learning enhancement

Future Directions

  • Reach: Find additional avenues of content delivery
  • Control: Consider limiting content to target demographic
    • Closed group may conflict with openness philosophy
  • Quality: Improve imaging cases
  • Responsibility: Incorporate testing to assess impact

Conclusions

Facebook and Buffer

  • Powerful: Push learning with broad reach
  • Information-rich: Highly revealing metrics
  • Natural for users: Fits habits of Digital Natives
  • Simple for administrators: Set up once, run repeatedly

Well received by students

Widely applicable to other educational scenarios

Acknowledgments

Facebook, Inc.

Buffer

Foundations of Human Anatomy,
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Institute for Excellence in Education

Supported by the M.R. and Evelyn Hudson Foundation

Thank You!

Liwei Jiang
liwei.jiang@jhmi.edu

Mentor

Donna Magid, M.D., M.Ed.
dmagid@jhmi.edu